Review the list and image below, which both outline how the in-text citation in your essay connects to the larger reference page of your work.
(click on image to enlarge)
(click on image to enlarge)
• Who publishes the website? Is this a well-know or respected institution?
• Is there contact information for authors of the website content? What is their background or credentials?
• Is it a commercial site (.com), a government site (.gov), an educational site (.edu), a non-profit or other organization (.org)? How does this affect the information presented?
• Do other reliable sites link to this one?
• Are facts, ideas or references credible and backed up by citations to the original sources?
PURPOSE and OBJECTIVITY
• What is the purpose of this site: to sell, inform, entertain or persuade?
• Who sponsors this website? What is their agenda or goal?
• For what audience is this site written?
• Is there advertising on the site? Does this influence information found on the site?
• Are arguments well-reasoned and supported?
• Is the information on the page up-to-date?
• Is the page updated regularly?
• Are there dead links?
• What is the source's thesis? (According to the author, __________________.)
• How does the thesis develop, support, or refute your topic? (I learned ___________ about my topic as a result of reading this source.)
• Does this source present explicit bias? If so, how does this source's perspective develop your topic?
Use the technique of Lateral Reading to Validate Claims and Sources
(click on image to enlarge)
This work is licensed under a creative commons attribution license.
Ask yourself whether you know and trust the author, publisher, publication, or website.
When investigating a source, fact-checkers read “laterally” across many websites, rather than digging deep (reading “vertically”) into the one source they are evaluating.
What if the source you find is low-quality, or you can’t determine if it is reliable or not?
What if you feel uncertain about the "full story" of a fact or claim, or you suspect someone might want to mislead you (as when controversial issues are presented)?
Modified from Mike Caulfield's SIFT (Four Moves), which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Graphic created by Suzanne Sannwald based on Mike Caulfield's work on SIFT. Creative Commons Attribution License.